{"id":"W2364049926","doi":"","title":"Influence of Acceptor Doping on the Defect Chemistry of TiO_2","year":2002,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"CAE (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Doping; Conductivity; Acceptor; Dopant; Vacancy defect; Materials science; Oxygen; Electron acceptor; Chemistry; Physical chemistry; Crystallography; Photochemistry; Optoelectronics; Condensed matter physics; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001731641,0.0002654443,0.0001714092,0.0001210751,0.000117469,0.0004043348,0.0002051663,0.0002002365,0.001170212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004231883,0.000156096,0.0001064071,0.00009141743,0.0001778565,0.0002028819,0.0001156843,0.0002356624,0.0001867936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001617619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001633908,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008580937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001026648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998935,0.00001573995,0.000009192743,0.00002898895,0.00002509639,0.00002740463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999788,0.00009461919,0.000033174,0.000015891,0.00003411665,0.00003434916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002276329,0.00001697135,0.0004319241,0.00002267787,0.000004122092,0.00003558935,0.0000160768,0.00008900328,0.9982443,0.0000703431,0.00002169628,0.0008196857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007960452,0.0001389722,0.001930466,0.000003592467,0.00001309027,0.00004888689,0.00001856815,0.001212553,0.9961122,0.00002952628,0.0004798669,0.000004389845],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978676,0.0002779655,0.0006864812,0.00003081036,0.00002494352,0.000006940584,0.0001172929,0.00002298698,0.0009649417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984665,0.0001624775,0.0004266705,0.00001875161,0.000004427277,0.000005918163,0.0001073941,0.00001512489,0.0007928313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001170212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003914773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01273961771029238,"score_gpt":0.1927656460454993,"score_spread":0.1800260283352069,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}