{"id":"W2372440949","doi":"10.1287/opre.2016.1509","title":"Competitive Equilibria in Two-Sided Matching Markets with General Utility Functions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Microsoft Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical proof; Competitive equilibrium; Characterization (materials science); Mathematical economics; Constructive; Matching (statistics); Point (geometry); Perfect competition; Complete lattice; Competition (biology); Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003195215,0.00009247771,0.0002053889,0.000343769,0.0003012414,0.0001436212,0.0001865545,0.00004073683,0.001627347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003362512,0.00007248348,0.00003367736,0.0004459744,0.0001556638,0.0003514455,0.00007807068,0.0002186225,0.001223947],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001399005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006671523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001429695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003427423,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985092,0.0002849092,0.0003733191,0.0003784225,0.0000772837,0.0003769042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991033,0.000319238,0.00002960288,0.0003638867,0.0001075364,0.00007645513],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008037546,0.00009605536,0.03805445,0.000009357391,0.00002214076,0.000005874199,0.0004965211,0.0002546142,0.001820747,0.9584291,0.0002199402,0.0005108091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01169847,0.0007081546,0.7225385,0.001091865,0.00001069003,0.0000899082,0.004985219,0.06052807,0.002076457,0.1288648,0.06561727,0.001790643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8820454,0.00006986455,0.004078459,0.001026809,0.0001111905,0.0003085683,0.0001110142,0.00002409995,0.1122246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776728,0.0000104175,0.0005024711,0.00002059226,0.0001087649,0.0001003778,0.00001313627,0.00001614599,0.02155526],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8295643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995537,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09652070557818943,"score_gpt":0.3410041735002537,"score_spread":0.2444834679220643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}