{"id":"W2372440949","doi":"10.1287/opre.2016.1509","title":"Competitive Equilibria in Two-Sided Matching Markets with General Utility Functions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Operations Research","topic":"Game Theory and Voting Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Microsoft Research; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Mathematical proof; Competitive equilibrium; Characterization (materials science); Mathematical economics; Constructive; Matching (statistics); Point (geometry); Perfect competition; Complete lattice; Competition (biology); Economics; Mathematics; Computer science; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003106126,0.0008734181,0.001368587,0.001296235,0.001237821,0.002863329,0.00190126,0.001535979,0.006053541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01029422,0.0004855565,0.001291675,0.001694994,0.002878671,0.004959077,0.002208901,0.001774502,0.0006437816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002022689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009467964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001315527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009929319,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974847,0.001185032,0.0001096221,0.0003445387,0.0004659437,0.0004101806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960337,0.002480743,0.000540218,0.0002580018,0.0003748075,0.0003124264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004492584,0.00004047525,0.0002500608,0.00003687128,0.00001990115,0.00007825326,0.00009774645,0.03877197,0.000510197,0.9560418,0.0003522441,0.003755524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003323484,0.00002870616,0.0001153502,0.00001092097,0.000007760866,0.00005654251,0.00005330078,0.2187546,0.0002703101,0.7797803,0.0008739676,0.00001497302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1620599,0.0004337242,0.8077942,0.0005126096,0.00003649001,0.0001789597,0.0002097049,0.00008356837,0.02869076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9123338,0.0004167691,0.07956629,0.0001303589,0.00006192781,0.0003459429,0.0001662419,0.00004166314,0.006936979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006053541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0202511,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09652070557818943,"score_gpt":0.3410041735002537,"score_spread":0.2444834679220643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}