{"id":"W2372567614","doi":"10.3390/f7050107","title":"Rating a Wildfire Mitigation Strategy with an Insurance Premium: A Boreal Forest Case Study","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forests","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval; Centre de Géomatique du Québec","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Forest management; Logging; Environmental science; Stock (firearms); Risk management; Business; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Agroforestry; Economics; Forestry; Geography; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003045435,0.0001887468,0.0001575229,0.00002679386,0.0001683549,0.00005578432,0.0001775648,0.00005528679,0.00003898475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003846774,0.0001164666,0.00002301221,0.0001948365,0.0001085338,0.0008289368,0.00005406825,0.00007757504,0.0001080123],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001501348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001995363,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3444291,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985228,0.0001471015,0.0002192123,0.000433803,0.0003505468,0.0003266018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992003,0.00008474203,0.0001327415,0.0004140948,0.000009142176,0.0001590021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004515759,0.0001739993,0.9767005,0.000008172509,0.000009398317,0.0010668,0.0006904418,0.0001826294,0.0004179648,0.000008412826,0.0000889344,0.02060758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001093803,0.001768134,0.9915548,0.00006983358,0.00000942902,0.0009066439,0.0003554441,0.003755434,0.0001678308,0.0000827708,0.00002560389,0.0002102767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976822,0.000005899476,0.000215712,0.00002751109,0.00005784158,0.000998914,0.00001101272,0.0001056239,0.0008953178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994472,3.462045e-7,0.00018707,0.00001291901,0.00006858493,0.000155456,0.000005269105,0.00003178458,0.00009133517],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3343047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964673,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00812523031783128,"score_gpt":0.2332958057010525,"score_spread":0.2251705753832212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}