{"id":"W2373303669","doi":"","title":"Comparative Analysis on the International Competitiveness of China Honey Trade","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Trade","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Yearbook; Competitor analysis; International trade; Quality (philosophy); SWOT analysis; Revealed comparative advantage; Disadvantage; Business; Comparative advantage; Economics; Marketing; Geography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009297759,0.0003272303,0.0002657832,0.00698512,0.0007325917,0.001709447,0.0002703734,0.0002831838,0.004444327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001135197,0.0000785456,0.0005601341,0.009107674,0.000661357,0.001284233,0.0006414488,0.0002757259,0.0001869518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003498982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002005871,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03030838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03761948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991949,0.00009057178,0.00004117216,0.0001094105,0.0003890414,0.000174848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999171,0.0001120021,0.0001605712,0.00004515438,0.0003761853,0.0001351873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006486825,0.00008730346,0.7523411,0.0005069961,0.0004229578,0.001931509,0.003416423,0.006101513,0.005620481,0.05515316,0.006939779,0.1668301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008999052,0.0001296742,0.9759706,0.00005022026,0.0001108186,0.000246782,0.00253971,0.002312186,0.001043133,0.0011591,0.01640169,0.00002709456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9424494,0.002937839,0.0005386705,0.0002832612,0.00003148511,0.00003024329,0.000885605,0.00001773498,0.05282584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948867,0.001016087,0.0002594259,0.00002281508,0.00001839997,0.00000975524,0.0009909213,0.000004233333,0.002791614],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03030838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06026393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02485675588345128,"score_gpt":0.2666179172481663,"score_spread":0.241761161364715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}