{"id":"W2374812233","doi":"10.1145/2884781.2884852","title":"Revisiting code ownership and its relationship with software quality in the scope of modern code review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Code review; Computer science; Heuristics; Code (set theory); Software quality; Scope (computer science); KPI-driven code analysis; Object code; Redundant code; Software; Code smell; Quality (philosophy); Software engineering; Programming language; Software development; Code generation; Computer security; Key (lock); Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03922754,0.0004161326,0.0005516704,0.008113853,0.001287138,0.004402994,0.001373749,0.0009891409,0.0015749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3875311,0.0005339221,0.0005198328,0.004992023,0.004301838,0.006663828,0.003564343,0.001402194,0.0002422197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002316805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003067872,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006785924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009690536,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9520876,0.02056732,0.004908911,0.005278057,0.01523887,0.001919267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1808516,0.5687206,0.1821622,0.02330769,0.03876571,0.006192265],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009204471,0.00005998449,0.9596271,0.0001722474,0.00009847466,0.0001637167,0.007500687,0.0005853257,0.0006738583,0.000891345,0.0002743946,0.02986089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001276149,0.0001931108,0.9838306,0.000190228,0.0001003749,0.000519454,0.006435418,0.003120336,0.001009702,0.002008512,0.002535988,0.00004356928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852411,0.002052508,0.007156848,0.0007408528,0.00003153695,0.00008203602,0.00006834112,0.00006699462,0.004559722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981498,0.0001736223,0.001268802,0.00004699146,0.00002595201,0.00001642559,0.00003892041,0.00001768215,0.0002618355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9607725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2074575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09319115713258627,"score_gpt":0.3394747782210961,"score_spread":0.2462836210885098,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}