{"id":"W2375572031","doi":"","title":"EVALUATION OF REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY OF ECOLOGICAL COMSUMPTION BASED ON ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN HUNAN PROVINCE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Geography","topic":"Environmental Quality and Pollution","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological footprint; Sustainability; Ecological deficit; Per capita; Carrying capacity; Sustainable development; Consumption (sociology); Environmental resource management; Ecology; Natural resource economics; Geography; Environmental science; Economics; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001848568,0.00009882035,0.0001784965,0.0000800142,0.00005472747,0.000001907249,0.0001319375,0.0001066953,0.001384329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007365739,0.00009453594,0.0001194145,0.00007875917,0.0006405743,0.00006471588,0.00005752522,0.0001003527,0.00002691721],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007336758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005135087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004556747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006190919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984918,0.000396054,0.0003841743,0.0002907258,0.0002749405,0.0001622687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994074,0.0001406747,0.0001885128,0.0002111863,0.000008211725,0.00004405247],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006399929,0.0007109112,0.8260292,0.00000744048,0.000003716771,6.350122e-7,0.0000436691,0.1698764,0.0001272885,0.0002823359,0.00002589019,0.002828553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006651356,0.0003525255,0.9788646,0.000004590683,0.00001005863,9.788241e-7,0.00004429901,0.01567814,0.0004998924,0.00362947,0.0001592809,0.0000910269],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963672,0.000008034253,0.0000431097,0.0003028435,0.00003592065,0.0004890342,0.000009759427,0.000007334443,0.002736771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996485,0.00001176415,0.0001853006,0.00008449119,0.000008877017,0.00003916411,0.00001315289,0.000003102202,0.000005670367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1541982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995285,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03326343102562557,"score_gpt":0.2617364040549327,"score_spread":0.2284729730293071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}