{"id":"W2380913246","doi":"10.3168/jds.2015-10708","title":"Technical note: Bayesian calibration of dynamic ruminant nutrition models","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Dairy Science","topic":"Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Toronto","funders":"University of California, Davis; Ajinomoto Heartland","keywords":"Bayesian probability; Calibration; Ruminant; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Bayesian inference; Residual; Econometrics; Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Algorithm; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006237661,0.0008193885,0.000994404,0.001023539,0.0005222505,0.001715378,0.002177566,0.001400142,0.005562413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03080475,0.0007333891,0.001331887,0.0009580279,0.001046566,0.002560905,0.002814573,0.00319399,0.002263879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001020965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001487296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003430867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001952443,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968579,0.00116549,0.0001521541,0.0004442369,0.0012546,0.0001256743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920115,0.003963685,0.000751709,0.001379692,0.001708092,0.000185306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008673903,0.00005565413,0.002627845,0.0001818933,0.000103503,0.0003234628,0.0001783198,0.5387671,0.004329856,0.3666705,0.009841272,0.07683381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001360323,0.00003063964,0.0004783156,0.00006674561,0.00002770427,0.0002311327,0.00001836991,0.7733337,0.001788205,0.2089366,0.01501517,0.00005965279],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001663895,0.0001577947,0.9949682,0.0005942773,0.00009403804,0.00001626172,0.0001231402,0.0001713495,0.0022111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2575572,0.001836612,0.7272593,0.0009973051,0.000776972,0.0003383913,0.001257682,0.0007092793,0.009267236],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006237661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03298825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009037059448613927,"score_gpt":0.2558444099301028,"score_spread":0.2468073504814889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}