{"id":"W2381721497","doi":"","title":"Empirical Analysis of International Competitiveness of China's Wood Forest Products","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues of Forestry Economics","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Revealed comparative advantage; Index (typography); Business; Forest product; International trade; Comparative advantage; Product (mathematics); Agricultural economics; Scale (ratio); International market; Forestry; Economics; Forest management; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001361164,0.0001317571,0.0004700764,0.0003357278,0.00002149216,0.00003048058,0.0005292613,0.00005724814,0.0001116285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000659708,0.000134755,0.000177238,0.000433388,0.0001000555,0.000415138,0.0001086155,0.0000540228,0.00000503065],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001755385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002452022,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002623793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009536811,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990789,0.00000615589,0.0004558752,0.0002146204,0.0001088726,0.0001356002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989843,0.00002188708,0.0004542056,0.0003165001,0.0002132493,0.000009846696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008998133,0.0002728371,0.9077141,0.00008552739,0.0003701314,0.000001661238,0.0000386079,0.01009094,0.0001256215,0.08082594,0.00002440851,0.0003602962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003003729,0.00002971976,0.9822871,0.00004874754,0.0002434187,5.169356e-7,0.00009889732,0.003078997,0.001226563,0.005297401,0.007265786,0.0001224805],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874902,0.0001030727,0.00004851089,0.001261309,0.0001772026,0.00009429613,0.00003578908,0.00001474376,0.01077484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991276,0.00005341939,0.0003195277,0.00009050444,0.0002370553,0.000001891909,0.0001163378,0.00000704145,0.0000466298],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07552854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5495148,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01974906464930203,"score_gpt":0.2607735775652896,"score_spread":0.2410245129159876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}