{"id":"W2381721497","doi":"","title":"Empirical Analysis of International Competitiveness of China's Wood Forest Products","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues of Forestry Economics","topic":"Global Trade and Competitiveness","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Revealed comparative advantage; Index (typography); Business; Forest product; International trade; Comparative advantage; Product (mathematics); Agricultural economics; Scale (ratio); International market; Forestry; Economics; Forest management; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001226428,0.0003004616,0.0002842005,0.002920012,0.0005964033,0.001109065,0.0003630093,0.0002472866,0.003086239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002116199,0.0001095834,0.000469501,0.004265062,0.0005510057,0.0007528752,0.0004499384,0.0003490209,0.0001810177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001936354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002249384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05519807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04686478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995008,0.00005941825,0.00003622956,0.00007066625,0.0001651379,0.0001678305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982317,0.0005578986,0.0004433516,0.00007546006,0.0004396279,0.0002520304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005348238,0.00007303926,0.9877209,0.00003159625,0.00005742356,0.0002205655,0.0004442118,0.002098138,0.0002264063,0.001230831,0.0005527493,0.007290588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004844174,0.00003566987,0.9942631,0.00001324922,0.00002563521,0.00004225202,0.001011038,0.003358985,0.0002380379,0.000144544,0.0008567262,0.000005927236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997021,0.0001084226,0.00006765419,0.00004869362,0.000002005866,0.00000789413,0.00025251,0.000002231963,0.00248948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998709,0.00008175069,0.0000511023,0.000006908277,0.000003790271,0.000006157095,0.0007455669,9.609618e-7,0.0003947979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05519807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1097535,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01974906464930203,"score_gpt":0.2607735775652896,"score_spread":0.2410245129159876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}