{"id":"W2382826009","doi":"","title":"Evaluation of International Competitiveness of China's Wood Furniture Industry","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Technology and Industry","topic":"Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bedroom; China; Business; Revealed comparative advantage; Product (mathematics); Index (typography); Furniture industry; Competitive advantage; Comparative advantage; Wood industry; Agricultural economics; Commerce; International trade; Economy; Pulp and paper industry; Forestry; Economics; Marketing; Geography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001931217,0.00006622456,0.0002068863,0.000895417,0.00007317426,0.000007811369,0.0002962952,0.0004961603,0.0005659885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002418787,0.00006821092,0.00003115994,0.0008304582,0.0009957481,0.000358003,0.0001002929,0.0004134545,0.000008934769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005925842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007710236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003579333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000218127,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992535,0.000009917621,0.0003076444,0.0001814259,0.00009285507,0.0001547038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993262,0.00001019219,0.0003297739,0.0001576842,0.0001313617,0.0000448416],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000193643,0.0000493488,0.736991,0.000002801766,0.00002729511,5.586872e-8,0.00008052921,0.0000708422,0.000234919,0.2596365,0.000006090507,0.002898647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004151919,0.00004297102,0.9353942,0.00002935051,0.00002964901,0.00001118269,0.0009369042,0.002732415,0.006531667,0.05137084,0.002356278,0.0001493257],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9776033,0.0008990437,0.0001289407,0.001147086,0.0002214499,0.00005370902,0.00002652127,0.000008777832,0.0199112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996159,0.00003664777,0.0001292986,0.00002381716,0.00004260662,0.000006165534,0.000002254894,0.000002785553,0.0001405209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2082657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6197178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04048947631815412,"score_gpt":0.2711922668948769,"score_spread":0.2307027905767228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}