{"id":"W2382826009","doi":"","title":"Evaluation of International Competitiveness of China's Wood Furniture Industry","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science Technology and Industry","topic":"Regional Economic and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bedroom; China; Business; Revealed comparative advantage; Product (mathematics); Index (typography); Furniture industry; Competitive advantage; Comparative advantage; Wood industry; Agricultural economics; Commerce; International trade; Economy; Pulp and paper industry; Forestry; Economics; Marketing; Geography; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007345789,0.0002812468,0.0002054444,0.004221846,0.0004351525,0.0009300032,0.0002329497,0.0002003324,0.001641145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007139549,0.00008024166,0.0003953656,0.003639149,0.0003512688,0.0006152085,0.0004507465,0.0001569874,0.0001267428],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001551845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001064774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03294392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02933664,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996513,0.00003702115,0.00002922141,0.00004789577,0.0001304935,0.0001041405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993222,0.00009664889,0.000157399,0.00002579299,0.0002468341,0.0001511851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001933991,0.00008294385,0.9683508,0.0000592252,0.0001017499,0.0004554485,0.0005625857,0.003656769,0.00238677,0.001924843,0.0006874225,0.02153794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004295538,0.00008891447,0.9952652,0.000005701093,0.00002947182,0.00005848251,0.0007769712,0.002157259,0.0005851029,0.0001204123,0.0008999131,0.000008194353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953033,0.0001945418,0.00009180186,0.00003188116,0.00000282279,0.000006470168,0.0002437255,0.000003987794,0.004121468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989464,0.0001013525,0.00005734168,0.000003790666,0.00000360582,0.000002437325,0.0004552995,0.000001080487,0.0004288756],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03294392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06550431,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04048947631815412,"score_gpt":0.2711922668948769,"score_spread":0.2307027905767228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}