{"id":"W2392838286","doi":"","title":"Forecasting analysis potential space distribution of Mikania micrantha in Guangzhou","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zhongnan Linye Keji Daxue xuebao","topic":"Forest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mikania micrantha; Precipitation; Distribution (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin); Environmental science; Forestry; Geography; Biology; Mathematics; Botany; Invasive species; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001329953,0.0001951206,0.000448955,0.0002729195,0.0004197846,0.00006652482,0.0004616652,0.0003938883,0.0002887589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006655208,0.0001983209,0.0002562006,0.001373713,0.0004935505,0.000258778,0.0000682403,0.0005192288,0.00003808512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006810817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001893479,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01348363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1391876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979331,0.000219851,0.0004798719,0.0003904721,0.0003664031,0.0006103177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988022,0.000316119,0.0002901696,0.0003120555,0.0001272218,0.0001521959],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001392843,0.0004072396,0.9562774,0.0000647218,0.0003589209,0.0001664131,0.009994005,0.001437951,0.003099839,0.02138079,0.003452061,0.0032214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002666559,0.0002791892,0.8823946,0.000183055,0.001388476,0.00004130636,0.006436259,0.03818244,0.003988394,0.01039319,0.05247599,0.001570586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910606,0.00007742563,0.0003338655,0.0007209245,0.001093722,0.000236742,0.0002457296,0.00005553711,0.006175456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974495,0.00005435178,0.0006469708,0.00003025207,0.0004535834,0.00001000603,0.0002915417,0.00001390139,0.001049896],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.125704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01278289122676058,"score_gpt":0.2653252483581403,"score_spread":0.2525423571313797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}