{"id":"W2395553017","doi":"10.1177/160940690900800108","title":"Time Line Drawings: Enhancing Participant Voice in Narrative Interviews on Sensitive Topics","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Line drawings; Narrative; Line (geometry); Visual arts; Space (punctuation); Participant observation; Psychology; Computer science; Art; Sociology; Engineering drawing; Literature; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03748395,0.001539295,0.0005237712,0.002544497,0.00298819,0.00486409,0.002228665,0.002779562,0.005229526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09517048,0.0008138756,0.0005619635,0.002788107,0.007025118,0.008621553,0.008010111,0.002266275,0.001538343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001050245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001434996,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003732768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008563175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9400128,0.0548376,0.0007069323,0.00105313,0.002694322,0.0006952658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88069,0.1030049,0.005199387,0.00586247,0.004090087,0.001153106],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005668758,0.0001734065,0.001090734,0.001184613,0.00002810619,0.001821356,0.7970522,0.001281265,0.02458413,0.04034486,0.00683711,0.1250353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003785126,0.001225597,0.003014277,0.002942151,0.0001392266,0.005448882,0.4379382,0.007861741,0.04222873,0.06622871,0.4321634,0.000430572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1941077,0.001568775,0.7394335,0.005730559,0.0009125097,0.004067438,0.0003634488,0.001548446,0.05226764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.556374,0.001320407,0.427703,0.0007710647,0.0001779234,0.004662947,0.0001821107,0.000506062,0.00830242],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03748395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1982364,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.894504397090155,"score_gpt":0.7735642627430143,"score_spread":0.1209401343471407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}