{"id":"W2396021487","doi":"10.1080/21606544.2019.1581094","title":"Valuing malaria morbidity: results from a global meta-analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"FP7 Environment","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Meta-analysis; Malaria; Meta-regression; Replicate; Random effects model; Welfare; Econometrics; Economics; Order (exchange); Public economics; Actuarial science; Environmental health; Medicine; Statistics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007022537,0.0002086493,0.001055379,0.0002348775,0.00005545023,0.00008562024,0.0002069042,0.0001155821,0.001917711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002006277,0.0002206702,0.0008246303,0.00008940868,0.0000669232,0.0004579709,0.0001163207,0.0001361794,0.00052755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004611908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000185006,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007972248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002993916,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980979,0.00002583617,0.001245109,0.0003738441,0.00003648296,0.0002208386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981502,0.00006763174,0.001301235,0.0003153128,0.000002417823,0.0001632238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003039259,0.0004631346,0.7186534,0.00001251819,0.1087299,0.0000102942,0.001023589,0.04262576,0.0002012705,0.1258021,0.0003802885,0.00179385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002066288,0.00017664,0.9401799,0.000001798358,0.007780035,0.00002306543,0.0001872245,0.004448188,0.00004394699,0.03131623,0.01336493,0.0004117108],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868179,0.002358506,0.0001080728,0.001668012,0.0001920503,0.0001134286,0.002439512,0.000003327481,0.006299172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483,0.002849821,0.0009093567,0.00061797,0.0002144641,0.000002094048,0.00005093677,0.00001686969,0.0005084762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2215266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09195392238064207,"score_gpt":0.2378607942893716,"score_spread":0.1459068719087296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}