{"id":"W239686093","doi":"","title":"A Complementary Analysis for the Structural Safety Evaluation of the Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Canister for the Canadian Deuterium and Uranium Reactor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spent nuclear fuel; Radioactive waste; Nuclear engineering; Nuclear fuel; Uranium; Waste management; Depleted uranium; Nuclear power; Environmental science; Spent fuel pool; Engineering; Materials science; Nuclear physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003880668,0.0008743623,0.0005356337,0.0008793423,0.00063479,0.0005073202,0.0007566679,0.0007737948,0.003720057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008585463,0.0003117236,0.001013816,0.0003691093,0.0004913468,0.0004552899,0.0004438554,0.0006220852,0.0004344565],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001950976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002304598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03403149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05733967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994919,0.00004548205,0.000006947275,0.00005797936,0.0003425539,0.00005509525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995947,0.0001132718,0.00004432194,0.00004007152,0.0001853267,0.00002228133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001824603,0.00008985916,0.003821856,0.0001230748,0.00005158888,0.0001383113,0.00006385315,0.8747225,0.08811679,0.003538901,0.000788515,0.02836238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000289676,0.0004616236,0.008241969,0.000008226332,0.00008545329,0.00009665174,0.0001467817,0.9192298,0.067544,0.0008428767,0.003279748,0.00003399285],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7694372,0.0001402124,0.2098004,0.0001936664,0.00004660209,0.0001266141,0.00101004,0.0003970679,0.01884827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616278,0.00009567866,0.03196514,0.00002677366,0.000006912305,0.00005116008,0.0006132884,0.00006526722,0.005548036],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9659685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06766677,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01920451974353123,"score_gpt":0.2483984346860833,"score_spread":0.229193914942552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}