{"id":"W239686093","doi":"","title":"A Complementary Analysis for the Structural Safety Evaluation of the Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposal Canister for the Canadian Deuterium and Uranium Reactor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea","topic":"Nuclear and radioactivity studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spent nuclear fuel; Radioactive waste; Nuclear engineering; Nuclear fuel; Uranium; Waste management; Depleted uranium; Nuclear power; Environmental science; Spent fuel pool; Engineering; Materials science; Nuclear physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002970403,0.0001392055,0.0002393998,0.00007447023,0.0002934213,0.00003868716,0.0003263,0.00003092626,0.000005966081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006187233,0.00006551507,0.000281424,0.000184129,0.0001115471,0.0001407924,0.00003101973,0.0001521751,2.96559e-8],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002330291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007943742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00105239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005181578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990239,0.00001966299,0.0003596276,0.00007216795,0.0003797079,0.0001448947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992117,0.0001750682,0.000182977,0.0001373882,0.0002476742,0.00004522259],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004294437,0.000001883249,0.0004200602,0.00003233257,0.0009553495,1.498959e-7,0.0004633405,0.9939225,0.0003252862,0.001840319,0.0001263342,0.001869526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003860996,0.00002527188,0.4379551,0.00001849066,0.0005848578,0.00002548256,0.00004548086,0.55931,0.00004146001,0.0005216763,0.001026369,0.00005968555],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831868,0.0006477612,0.007096702,0.005495634,0.002360245,0.0008417406,0.0003280196,0.000011543,0.00003158337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976329,0.00001214957,0.002091515,0.00005922201,0.0001819685,0.000001879962,0.000007316925,0.00001104403,0.00000201986],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.437535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2891442,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01920451974353123,"score_gpt":0.2483984346860833,"score_spread":0.229193914942552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}