{"id":"W239796332","doi":"10.1023/a:1026276822721","title":"Construct Validity of a Kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation Administered Within a Worker's Compensation Environment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Foundation Medicine; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; Health Research Board","keywords":"Visual analogue scale; Construct validity; Context (archaeology); Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Low back pain; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Psychology; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003400102,0.0001722745,0.0004299838,0.0003115748,0.00007780299,0.00001255801,0.00005172843,0.0001264638,0.0004013926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006143736,0.0001433293,0.000367833,0.0002703604,0.0002978583,0.000309324,0.000008450034,0.000232539,0.00001041578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004257971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000683735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003881962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001914522,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958577,0.0008556845,0.001287836,0.0002201907,0.001651576,0.0001269896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995487,0.001473167,0.001140244,0.0002125593,0.001543849,0.0001431197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007542606,0.004203218,0.7319206,0.001375253,0.0004492471,0.000003181965,0.003436719,0.01675676,0.186733,0.03914281,0.0007664646,0.007670109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003005582,0.002269031,0.9798601,0.0002449015,0.0001941645,0.00004816866,0.0005052228,0.002737358,0.001734342,0.009137496,0.0001406074,0.0001230676],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887704,0.00003589462,0.009289266,0.0004031348,0.0004471875,0.0007074033,0.00001101128,0.000008076515,0.0003276787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.959486,0.000002998117,0.04021233,0.00004680948,0.0001404524,0.00002318647,0.00005614033,0.00001302243,0.00001905589],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2479394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7355069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07697711421632039,"score_gpt":0.3328326143563644,"score_spread":0.255855500140044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}