{"id":"W239796332","doi":"10.1023/a:1026276822721","title":"Construct Validity of a Kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation Administered Within a Worker's Compensation Environment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","topic":"Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Foundation Medicine; Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale; Health Research Board","keywords":"Visual analogue scale; Construct validity; Context (archaeology); Physical therapy; Rehabilitation; Low back pain; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Psychology; Psychometrics; Clinical psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004586032,0.0005159447,0.0005265107,0.001554054,0.001082175,0.001187205,0.000640777,0.0006868303,0.001049027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01740676,0.0003301238,0.001012222,0.0007988925,0.0009061646,0.001041234,0.001705417,0.0009543143,0.0003752958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001147258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001675171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009760662,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996778,0.0007811843,0.0003966668,0.0002859605,0.00141751,0.0003408671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856635,0.005718565,0.003149453,0.000664087,0.003400148,0.001404162],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002876094,0.0006864358,0.9886115,0.00002779426,0.0001093614,0.00005063983,0.001056634,0.0002340432,0.0009465472,0.00009350955,0.0001615281,0.007734344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003187492,0.0005852188,0.9965139,0.00001935356,0.00003959834,0.0000509303,0.001226426,0.000693212,0.0004704839,0.0000620798,0.0002951469,0.00001179355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982092,0.00004976319,0.00023308,0.00005117566,0.00001968182,0.00006876829,0.00008272161,0.000007656654,0.001277939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988686,0.00004537209,0.000417613,0.00003246632,0.00001043257,0.00007747456,0.0001768941,0.000004742046,0.0003664488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02425349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07697711421632039,"score_gpt":0.3328326143563644,"score_spread":0.255855500140044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}