{"id":"W2398207428","doi":"10.21273/hortsci.35.3.448f","title":"329 Evaluation of Textile Fiber Residues for Horticultural Use","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HortScience","topic":"Growth and nutrition in plants","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pellets; Aeration; Potting; Bulk density; Textile; Fiber; Porosity; Potting soil; Cation-exchange capacity; Sawdust; Pulp and paper industry; Chemistry; Water holding capacity; Agronomy; Materials science; Environmental science; Food science; Composite material; Biology; Soil water; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000427123,0.0007008748,0.000389808,0.0006758937,0.0003816134,0.0005248985,0.000187533,0.0004311985,0.001376481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003597972,0.0001592058,0.0004199354,0.0005622449,0.0001696811,0.000305523,0.0002984628,0.0002405316,0.0004294816],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002211086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003055988,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009420167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002341802,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996312,0.00008663619,0.00003660153,0.00005351088,0.0001473763,0.00004469671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996989,0.0000455103,0.00005919235,0.00001779654,0.0001235246,0.00005505235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001966373,0.00005889911,0.0007309463,0.00008288017,0.00001135451,0.0001006001,0.00001984489,0.00007434093,0.9957258,0.00001020974,0.00001661798,0.002971855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008978256,0.001952951,0.01403571,0.0000202325,0.00005474563,0.0002225169,0.00007880063,0.000210717,0.9818803,0.00001197733,0.001514268,0.000008766354],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960453,0.000955495,0.001016372,0.00001437728,0.00001089882,0.00006776494,0.0002894641,0.00001589709,0.001584303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890921,0.001453653,0.004480207,0.00002774825,0.000008497715,0.00006690463,0.001091834,0.00003792884,0.00374114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001376481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004604757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06464031067485276,"score_gpt":0.2674632698962403,"score_spread":0.2028229592213875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}