{"id":"W2398207428","doi":"10.21273/hortsci.35.3.448f","title":"329 Evaluation of Textile Fiber Residues for Horticultural Use","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HortScience","topic":"Growth and nutrition in plants","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Pellets; Aeration; Potting; Bulk density; Textile; Fiber; Porosity; Potting soil; Cation-exchange capacity; Sawdust; Pulp and paper industry; Chemistry; Water holding capacity; Agronomy; Materials science; Environmental science; Food science; Composite material; Biology; Soil water; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003229865,0.00006251785,0.00008148987,0.000006985819,0.0001459922,0.00004217006,0.0001446635,0.00003506561,0.002060142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009245372,0.00002300281,0.00004842907,0.000250065,0.00008346957,0.0002748572,0.000009607108,0.0000270648,0.00003300801],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000981417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008265902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006830019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002744368,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990784,0.00003091908,0.0001552184,0.000191104,0.0003676543,0.0001767389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995614,0.0001081326,0.00004540174,0.000040557,0.0001856121,0.00005888563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001569581,0.0002776873,0.09755249,0.00001791867,0.000009760148,0.000001336162,0.0002334429,0.0001734308,0.1346142,0.0001823246,0.02719929,0.7395812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001298985,0.0001490033,0.9695873,0.00001461708,0.00001594473,0.000004342544,0.00004479019,0.0004512606,0.008326365,0.0004186788,0.02075864,0.0000991609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981309,0.00006305108,5.225933e-7,0.0001453663,0.00004367292,0.000279873,0.00008422793,0.00002057954,0.001231876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985554,0.00002562806,0.0001722581,0.00005996846,0.00006760474,0.0000386018,0.00005638306,2.791675e-7,0.001023892],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8720348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06464031067485276,"score_gpt":0.2674632698962403,"score_spread":0.2028229592213875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}