{"id":"W2399599283","doi":"10.5539/elt.v9n6p229","title":"Collaborative Blended Learning Writing Environment: Effects on EFL Students’ Writing Apprehension and Writing Performance","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Language Teaching","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Blended learning; Apprehension; Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Collaborative writing; Second language writing; Thematic analysis; Collaborative learning; Qualitative property; Cooperative learning; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Teaching method; Educational technology; Computer science; Second language; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001862309,0.0004746986,0.0006424271,0.0005766505,0.0007045345,0.001806195,0.0004724424,0.00054734,0.002649814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008940895,0.0002114732,0.0005283942,0.0003110111,0.0004977016,0.0007665674,0.001665601,0.0007810419,0.0005436499],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002465364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005001625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002376942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003810314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981516,0.0007762095,0.0001827605,0.0002215619,0.0004378162,0.0002300692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919965,0.003041664,0.001651687,0.000402558,0.000826431,0.002081103],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006061054,0.050025,0.2705263,0.001459168,0.0003281963,0.00305764,0.09973176,0.001032159,0.08078182,0.0003470532,0.001308769,0.485341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006600675,0.06507489,0.7798107,0.000465341,0.0004943559,0.002489567,0.08972245,0.003173515,0.04821686,0.0007631337,0.008878843,0.0002502744],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999298,0.00003728466,0.000127265,0.00002715431,0.000006691967,0.00001329205,0.000006350054,0.000008262231,0.0004757257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982073,0.00006535274,0.0006329413,0.00002776379,0.00000826976,0.00004418754,0.00001366332,0.000004071859,0.0009964162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002649814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009848893,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009835430635341228,"score_gpt":0.3167947984998338,"score_spread":0.3069593678644926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}