{"id":"W2400542454","doi":"10.29173/cais643","title":"Examining Polarization in Political Social Media: A Case of Twitter and the 2011 Canadian Federal Election","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Microblogging; Federal election; Polarization (electrochemistry); Politics; Political science; Sample (material); Internet privacy; Media studies; Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Law; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001996834,0.0002753985,0.0005227213,0.004348191,0.0117202,0.003543158,0.0009509719,0.001230418,0.001916567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008995774,0.0002686354,0.0002737052,0.009393486,0.003105859,0.001879706,0.0027295,0.001823543,0.0002460212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02273232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01654811,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9694889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.984154,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971022,0.000465972,0.00004082969,0.0001724753,0.0007973427,0.001421257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941235,0.001827951,0.001283079,0.0002291556,0.001681374,0.0008549222],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004572412,0.0002367935,0.8627264,0.00006988635,0.00008564175,0.001214746,0.08377049,0.001023155,0.00120231,0.01223872,0.01071431,0.0262604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001346251,0.00002447998,0.884644,0.00003795333,0.00002395376,0.00008725915,0.1008497,0.001543968,0.0003083382,0.0006371155,0.01178563,0.00004405872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882167,0.0001382555,0.0001131187,0.002089002,0.00001552264,0.00002897916,0.000503155,0.000003574721,0.008891702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976313,0.0001380567,0.00008963695,0.0001588169,0.00001901615,0.00002250486,0.000327772,0.000004858744,0.001607983],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03051114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1649354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03665589162996892,"score_gpt":0.2745085339782884,"score_spread":0.2378526423483195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}