{"id":"W2400694300","doi":"10.1177/0267658315589656","title":"Exploring the potential relationship between eye gaze and English L2 speakers’ responses to recasts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Second language Research","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Gaze; Psychology; Eye tracking; Prosody; Intonation (linguistics); Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Fluency; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics education","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001178945,0.0002690361,0.0002144695,0.0005545452,0.000280692,0.0009186928,0.0001818856,0.0004224487,0.001983626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01021047,0.0001794282,0.0001757144,0.0002906188,0.0003309412,0.000570676,0.0005683909,0.000397544,0.0002301727],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002433973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002674805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005313264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007419511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999318,0.0002682745,0.00003776243,0.0001576009,0.0001307235,0.00008770913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936515,0.003681696,0.001495619,0.0002350985,0.0007338995,0.000202195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007542926,0.000191827,0.8626357,0.0002367871,0.0001094887,0.0006822171,0.04141052,0.0002361809,0.0643456,0.000253215,0.0002957172,0.0288484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005738397,0.0001864432,0.9887995,0.00002555137,0.00001962722,0.0002559219,0.008099738,0.0004436384,0.001623601,0.000133527,0.0003908316,0.00001588745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988794,0.00006702967,0.0003775971,0.00002864972,0.000002136654,0.000008935363,0.00004029402,0.00000611207,0.000589905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991643,0.00004526079,0.0003308602,0.00001626424,0.00000250379,0.00001747693,0.00003695649,0.00000445696,0.0003818639],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005313264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01056468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2834098163506495,"score_gpt":0.4224880641932162,"score_spread":0.1390782478425667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}