{"id":"W2401983909","doi":"10.1177/0021955x16651241","title":"Morphological, physical and mechanical properties of nanocrystalline cellulose filled Nylon 6 foams","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cellular Plastics","topic":"Polymer Foaming and Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Ultimate tensile strength; Composite material; Flexural strength; Flexural modulus; Nanocrystalline material; Cellulose; Molding (decorative); Composite number; Extrusion; Izod impact strength test; Young's modulus; Chemical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002888262,0.0001364778,0.0003874098,0.00005817472,0.00004342785,0.00002819516,0.0002239969,0.00007071483,0.00006096912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002246751,0.00007024813,0.00009731772,0.00005613082,0.0001940228,0.0001083206,0.00009456064,0.0001024897,0.00001231188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001688127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004648382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002641268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.119192e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987675,0.00009660128,0.0004527872,0.0001340655,0.0003515408,0.0001974949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989924,0.0002316453,0.000382257,0.000125127,0.0001424953,0.0001260214],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002090304,0.0002150702,0.00002549765,0.00003050375,0.00001642974,0.00007230326,0.00009366814,0.000009234785,0.9985496,0.0003278854,0.00009287913,0.0003579178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006818158,0.0007485485,0.00002900998,0.0001940236,0.0000621038,0.0001386304,0.00002616992,0.0005191851,0.9968153,0.0004611885,0.0002165454,0.0001075006],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847901,0.0007758808,0.01394104,0.0001337963,0.0002711997,0.00004094141,0.0000102725,0.00001170918,0.00002504679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979732,0.00005511281,0.001563768,0.00001510678,0.0001909709,7.712543e-7,3.266608e-7,0.00001122784,0.0001895394],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01318306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2864636,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01478757150452991,"score_gpt":0.2026952585620473,"score_spread":0.1879076870575174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}