{"id":"W2402029394","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2016.24626","title":"Some Numbers behind Canada’s Decision to Adopt an Orphan Drug Policy: US Orphan Drug Approvals in Canada, 1997–2012","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare policy","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Canada Research Chairs; Genome Canada","keywords":"Orphan drug; Medicine; Access to medicines; Drug; Drug approval; Family medicine; Pharmacology; Bioinformatics; Public health; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002743804,0.0001891546,0.000486515,0.002601547,0.002639854,0.004600449,0.001046884,0.001236235,0.004169846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01170461,0.0003476645,0.0007522775,0.006274503,0.001885043,0.00119009,0.001054376,0.002187288,0.0001708951],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09903943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1043531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976629,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954124,0.0002395237,0.0002423288,0.0003583612,0.001848947,0.001898358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836997,0.002185594,0.00441673,0.0002680184,0.006545494,0.002884619],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001422499,0.0001420041,0.8737254,0.0005029678,0.0005383499,0.0007943248,0.005541694,0.005005663,0.001282394,0.02461602,0.03169983,0.05472885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004666619,0.00005236693,0.9590234,0.0001853051,0.0001153264,0.00009532503,0.004285793,0.001212115,0.0005720751,0.000510583,0.03382548,0.000075494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9059712,0.008897156,0.0005355993,0.030446,0.0001207415,0.00009318512,0.0176092,0.00003968537,0.03628732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896089,0.002407664,0.0002917094,0.001556832,0.00004361974,0.00001512863,0.002309719,0.00001412841,0.00375232],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7185847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03465915678921029,"score_gpt":0.2997397643554006,"score_spread":0.2650806075661903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}