{"id":"W2402181618","doi":"10.1139/er-2015-0090","title":"Economic and ecological trade-off analysis of forest ecosystems: options for boreal forests","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ecosystem services; Sustainability; Forest management; Environmental resource management; Ecology; Sustainable forest management; Ecoforestry; Forest ecology; Forest restoration; Boreal; Ecosystem; Geography; Environmental science; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003805956,0.0001757187,0.0004315086,0.00007993296,0.00007880561,0.00001122114,0.0001961307,0.00006193129,0.002463515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002018055,0.0001130651,0.0002696255,0.0000932162,0.0002545395,0.0001796586,0.0001415587,0.00003076455,0.0005978665],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002062706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002399875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004713401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001970974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987726,0.00006783487,0.0004613978,0.0003450846,0.00009785945,0.0002552077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992696,0.0001163713,0.0002108185,0.0002891154,1.035651e-7,0.0001139859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001933681,0.0001233143,0.8772614,0.00001865788,0.0001601106,8.169476e-7,0.00005993916,0.0001228897,0.0003757401,0.001018487,0.01505143,0.1057879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027708,0.0001089819,0.5981863,0.00001090666,0.0002849128,0.000001006356,0.000003356413,0.001200672,0.00001997609,0.0002171095,0.3995646,0.0001250508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921684,0.00159597,0.0002542877,0.0004385256,0.00006512566,0.001111757,0.0001686314,0.00001494156,0.004182361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902888,0.007397486,0.0004694346,0.0000870867,0.00004120682,0.0001925363,0.00006527804,0.00001297291,0.001445196],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3845132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01697334281491462,"score_gpt":0.2561463526765221,"score_spread":0.2391730098616075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}