{"id":"W2402986172","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-26561-2_43","title":"Ontology-based Information Extraction for Residential Land Use Suitability: A Case Study of the City of Regina, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Geographic Information Systems Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Computer science; Information extraction; Set (abstract data type); Identification (biology); Data mining; Information retrieval; Geographic information system; Cartography; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002081341,0.0001500571,0.0003208855,0.000292399,0.0004646638,0.00007723617,0.0004669664,0.0001453092,0.000002883009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008671511,0.0001154815,0.00006419312,0.0003660335,0.0007298267,0.0006168003,0.0001279691,0.0001989275,1.548981e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003824355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00243998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.669764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9806974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979681,0.00007926765,0.0004799313,0.0002015973,0.001047608,0.0002234926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965971,0.0007348274,0.0008047996,0.0004129337,0.001401124,0.00004921736],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003541179,0.0003098597,0.5440276,0.001104641,0.00023653,0.0000967664,0.2738742,0.08186652,0.000007783095,0.009641997,0.001570297,0.08690973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03020408,0.008397632,0.3485823,0.006024686,0.001665885,0.00133345,0.02554709,0.1330845,0.001043953,0.1264814,0.308019,0.009616062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6211483,0.00009470707,0.3641203,0.002408198,0.00516573,0.005434877,0.0001193754,0.00004672924,0.001461749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984736,0.000001005967,0.001297906,0.00007398515,0.00006876422,0.00001691786,0.000002278675,0.000003279153,0.00006218888],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3773253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4709198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0481097363177739,"score_gpt":0.30098332897154,"score_spread":0.2528735926537661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}