{"id":"W2404179284","doi":"","title":"MARSH BIRDS OF THE CONNECTICUT RIVER ESTUARY: A 20-YEAR PERSPECTIVE","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marsh; Habitat; Ecology; Geography; Estuary; Wetland; Cove; Salt marsh; Sparrow; Fishery; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007510311,0.0004914878,0.000159586,0.00355554,0.001095038,0.001275508,0.000423564,0.0005721023,0.002755523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004961097,0.0002241014,0.0001847169,0.001921792,0.0004325436,0.001266571,0.0007741425,0.0004077019,0.000248863],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001737284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001110232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1185995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4425329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998092,0.00003280792,0.00001581396,0.00003199021,0.00003621766,0.00007392997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993817,0.00004812333,0.0001782622,0.00001582026,0.00015164,0.0002244976],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001051065,0.0001668576,0.9499667,0.0001831398,0.00007692351,0.0009895131,0.002240284,0.0003482709,0.001408442,0.0003386393,0.003650518,0.04052544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000171063,0.00008667434,0.9894728,0.00005937025,0.00001269672,0.0002846198,0.000814027,0.00008522404,0.00009877746,0.00002013046,0.00905803,0.000005895102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795059,0.01185766,0.0001542555,0.0009548999,0.0001177074,0.00001756281,0.001891958,0.00002177255,0.005478312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742094,0.01570836,0.0004198091,0.0004028715,0.0001745343,0.00004520787,0.002867935,0.00001051267,0.006161286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1185995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2358184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004653033642557667,"score_gpt":0.2009786804794127,"score_spread":0.196325646836855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}