{"id":"W2405074597","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.005","title":"Forest carbon mitigation policy: A policy gap analysis for British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Forests; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Climate change mitigation; Business; Forest management; Natural resource economics; Carbon sequestration; Jurisdiction; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Carbon credit; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Economics; Ecology; Political science; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002555015,0.0003149702,0.0008415098,0.002665314,0.003491929,0.005254904,0.001701548,0.001996244,0.006775968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012149,0.0003164209,0.0006323843,0.00700555,0.001039562,0.00210129,0.001878105,0.002719532,0.0003095469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08154706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08203905,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9853475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972855,0.0003750647,0.00008025787,0.0001678304,0.0007205643,0.001370765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993942,0.001825005,0.0003554505,0.0001743225,0.003000507,0.0007028255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002425576,0.001159241,0.4065442,0.0008419076,0.0008864929,0.001918812,0.006005417,0.1286106,0.001411921,0.1797193,0.1352191,0.1352575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004219548,0.0003532652,0.6622019,0.0008705735,0.001329205,0.0003036833,0.05516045,0.1443037,0.002516473,0.03985153,0.09235071,0.0003365148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9255853,0.001706328,0.0006142664,0.008338346,0.0000444822,0.0001208981,0.006654759,0.00004298291,0.05689274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838353,0.000684143,0.0005668282,0.0006434473,0.000006661289,0.00007692984,0.001715761,0.00002515273,0.01244572],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08154706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5916681,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009565432709236,"score_gpt":0.2181160460123342,"score_spread":0.2085506133030982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}