{"id":"W2405074597","doi":"10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.005","title":"Forest carbon mitigation policy: A policy gap analysis for British Columbia","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Policy and Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia; Ministry of Forests; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Greenhouse gas; Climate change mitigation; Business; Forest management; Natural resource economics; Carbon sequestration; Jurisdiction; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Carbon credit; Environmental protection; Environmental science; Economics; Ecology; Political science; Agroforestry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002271115,0.0002020388,0.0003357317,0.0003210906,0.0002788407,0.0003635483,0.0002932553,0.0001457209,0.0003312504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002204515,0.0002443223,0.000211737,0.0006532097,0.0003822863,0.0004021052,0.0002517902,0.00005453644,0.0001315941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005183057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009638095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3950864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5765799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982812,0.00002670919,0.0003916147,0.0005026805,0.0000865314,0.0007113115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990165,0.000112868,0.0001928146,0.0003805974,0.00001072795,0.0002865157],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002732941,0.00004737102,0.9352351,0.00002473878,0.0002156795,0.000001467785,0.000186069,0.002030449,0.00002529395,0.03866311,0.009749797,0.01379362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001290199,0.0001775924,0.7148495,0.0000225385,0.0001935886,0.00001274843,0.0000139619,0.01061395,0.0000138387,0.1133144,0.1588991,0.0005985965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616128,0.00001386531,0.0001097705,0.00456892,0.00005682062,0.0004601897,0.0002501557,0.0000602459,0.03286728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.968035,0.0003351914,0.0002328733,0.00129455,0.001152879,0.0001141682,0.00006343978,0.00004014373,0.02873171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2203856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009565432709236,"score_gpt":0.2181160460123342,"score_spread":0.2085506133030982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}