{"id":"W2407569315","doi":"10.1088/0967-3334/37/6/922","title":"Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physiological Measurement","topic":"Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography","field":"Engineering","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Electrical impedance tomography; Imaging phantom; Electrode; Tomography; Biomedical engineering; Materials science; Supine position; Iterative reconstruction; Plane (geometry); Acoustics; Computer science; Computer vision; Physics; Optics; Mathematics; Geometry; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004720789,0.0001967127,0.0002325213,0.0001551793,0.00004546687,0.00001728927,0.00009238462,0.00007935289,0.00002166618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005323406,0.0001224658,0.00005421989,0.0005748501,0.00004173589,0.00012618,0.00001486516,0.0001313885,0.000004785126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001829572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000177598,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006187784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007752209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984031,0.0001265045,0.0002703843,0.000313618,0.000461847,0.0004245322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996254,0.00003789299,0.00004231491,0.000120761,0.00009357733,0.00008006639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003277099,0.0000489142,0.004167781,0.00001088414,0.00001625307,8.532184e-7,0.000008776488,0.0001134308,0.8800405,0.00007348151,0.000008219142,0.1154782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002668449,0.000629499,0.6896785,0.0002157176,0.00007574637,0.00001447979,0.000003712623,0.1773901,0.1232754,0.004939086,0.0002391925,0.0008700928],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907287,0.0008543861,0.007759126,0.00004515764,0.00006659704,0.00034764,0.000004027443,0.000140369,0.00005400601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999082,0.0003355587,0.0003293135,0.00004652118,0.0001137129,0.00007183015,0.000007279999,0.00001294372,8.678485e-7],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.756765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4994009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05100983886805489,"score_gpt":0.2568797658278417,"score_spread":0.2058699269597868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}