{"id":"W2407569315","doi":"10.1088/0967-3334/37/6/922","title":"Electrical impedance tomography in 3D using two electrode planes: characterization and evaluation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physiological Measurement","topic":"Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography","field":"Engineering","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Electrical impedance tomography; Imaging phantom; Electrode; Tomography; Biomedical engineering; Materials science; Supine position; Iterative reconstruction; Plane (geometry); Acoustics; Computer science; Computer vision; Physics; Optics; Mathematics; Geometry; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001420699,0.0004905312,0.0004497384,0.0005790052,0.00009805628,0.0008121413,0.0003658606,0.0008454932,0.0008651224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004697536,0.0003083548,0.0002817905,0.0006035181,0.0005913861,0.0006554846,0.0005416832,0.0002381247,0.0002450062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002077066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000202418,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000465783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004590586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992635,0.0002671068,0.0000547876,0.00007028443,0.0003109448,0.00003343613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997885,0.001191773,0.0002179529,0.0002631899,0.0003712177,0.00007077413],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001281137,0.0001533683,0.02428963,0.000500283,0.00009924267,0.0008655634,0.0005503236,0.02192763,0.8438715,0.0008998024,0.0003733711,0.1051882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000152077,0.00384619,0.1104084,0.00008377742,0.0002620978,0.01143584,0.0005024951,0.1583997,0.707849,0.001210126,0.005639178,0.000211246],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6619167,0.001278702,0.3342606,0.0002879786,0.00003348063,0.0001504097,0.0004160012,0.0004765154,0.001179669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9029492,0.001103307,0.09487294,0.00009615161,0.00002298418,0.0001062824,0.0002358155,0.00006315971,0.0005501957],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001420699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007513404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05100983886805489,"score_gpt":0.2568797658278417,"score_spread":0.2058699269597868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}