{"id":"W2407759797","doi":"","title":"An alternative a pproach to the classification of the regular near hexagons with parameters (s, t, t 2 ) = (2, 11, 1).","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Coding theory and cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Addendum; Binary Golay code; Ternary Golay code; Mathematics; Ternary operation; Characterization (materials science); Code (set theory); Section (typography); Combinatorics; Elementary proof; Discrete mathematics; Pure mathematics; Algorithm; Computer science; Mathematical analysis; Programming language; Linear code; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001425853,0.0009149768,0.001017929,0.002980677,0.002228389,0.003988914,0.002200223,0.002771377,0.009196065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004363925,0.0004946037,0.0008500281,0.002431388,0.004265382,0.005838671,0.00380004,0.004860325,0.00381251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009783007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000775721,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004545429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005765444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982275,0.0004768589,0.00008463237,0.0005732531,0.0004978439,0.0001398948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978866,0.0005963331,0.0002595999,0.0005131738,0.0005671545,0.000177079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004088566,0.00003157869,0.0003597712,0.0002281192,0.00001605494,0.0001938784,0.0003506711,0.000581822,0.001656414,0.972021,0.007064497,0.01745525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002399564,0.0001678458,0.0004347477,0.0001612686,0.00001729453,0.001170933,0.0004008956,0.006528885,0.002333597,0.8863057,0.1024085,0.00004611504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03158899,0.007797345,0.7814785,0.00670349,0.004747923,0.0002385786,0.0005392707,0.0004307081,0.1664752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4658148,0.007501507,0.4111872,0.009155787,0.005369848,0.0005238669,0.001253157,0.0003791273,0.09881473],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009196065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03076392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0304759875565965,"score_gpt":0.2473287293623804,"score_spread":0.2168527418057839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}