{"id":"W2409182273","doi":"10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-044","title":"Benchmarking Global Food Safety Performances: The Era of Risk Intelligence","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Food Protection","topic":"Food Safety and Hygiene","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Conference Board of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Food safety; Food safety risk analysis; Benchmarking; Business; Risk management; Accountability; Traceability; Hazard analysis and critical control points; Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Marketing; Environmental health; Environmental resource management; Engineering; Computer science; Computer security; Medicine; Finance; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02427032,0.002057565,0.001448999,0.003740486,0.0005309129,0.006864584,0.001726287,0.002044606,0.001612252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0282399,0.0002668117,0.0006117591,0.004764895,0.002931634,0.01011282,0.00495604,0.001918075,0.0003886268],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00270662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002867531,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003509545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002594617,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985143,0.006757309,0.0008244874,0.001490491,0.004661614,0.001123005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9779879,0.007928601,0.003847196,0.004507713,0.004548599,0.001180026],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006573282,0.0005869557,0.1262733,0.001108695,0.0011293,0.0002675302,0.002833904,0.2677927,0.005777454,0.12077,0.01167143,0.4611313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116697,0.003160571,0.1369146,0.001507953,0.0005202174,0.0003467812,0.0169172,0.3489962,0.01710208,0.4034888,0.07050389,0.0004249918],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6971216,0.009733557,0.1808429,0.01859829,0.001002536,0.000274952,0.002022201,0.001311284,0.08909269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857221,0.000974663,0.0115434,0.0003136019,0.000141116,0.00003135931,0.0006616596,0.00008102583,0.0005311311],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02427032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1283553,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04260446429873933,"score_gpt":0.232245032122309,"score_spread":0.1896405678235697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}