{"id":"W2409351111","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.5b00243","title":"Characterization of Polymeric Nanomaterials Using Analytical Ultracentrifugation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Coagulation and Flocculation Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nanomaterials; Dynamic light scattering; Characterization (materials science); Ionic strength; Analytical Ultracentrifugation; Sedimentation; Nanoparticle; Agglomerate; Materials science; Nanotechnology; Particle size; Chemistry; Particle-size distribution; Particle (ecology); Chemical engineering; Ultracentrifuge; Chromatography; Composite material; Sediment; Organic chemistry; Aqueous solution","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002940342,0.0001008352,0.0001464312,0.0002193511,0.0001542325,0.00001419033,0.0002196386,0.00006626712,0.0007241889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005342735,0.00009498096,0.00002344856,0.001113607,0.001763173,0.0003791892,0.0002683186,0.00004119807,0.0001164343],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003406248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000196043,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001655351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.387687e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998729,0.0000215491,0.0002725873,0.0002917163,0.0004565355,0.000228628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995256,0.000006576103,0.0001662193,0.0002078846,0.000005736251,0.0000879697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006350714,0.00004644425,0.1250997,4.909181e-7,0.000001884914,6.513839e-7,0.0001354414,0.0006144359,0.8714133,0.0002124368,0.000003509669,0.00246536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004614681,0.00010198,0.3443574,0.000005721653,0.00002046703,0.00003322053,0.0005237456,0.02076859,0.6306917,0.0003385239,0.002446916,0.0002502609],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963774,0.00001328043,0.00236034,0.0001541319,0.0001351308,0.0001483896,0.000006714446,0.00004732655,0.0007572842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991733,0.000007225229,0.000659595,0.00003392875,0.00001393884,0.00000442689,0.00000771831,0.000005706853,0.0000941425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2407216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7929361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02182949198594963,"score_gpt":0.2561049042924982,"score_spread":0.2342754123065485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}