{"id":"W2409935652","doi":"10.1016/j.cis.2016.05.015","title":"Resolving an ostensible inconsistency in calculating the evaporation rate of sessile drops","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Colloid and Interface Science","topic":"Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Iran National Science Foundation","keywords":"Sessile drop technique; Drop (telecommunication); Laplace's equation; Evaporation; Mechanics; Laplace transform; Contact angle; Boundary value problem; Thermodynamics; Chemistry; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008548807,0.0006697084,0.001023712,0.0007465257,0.0007562938,0.001631548,0.002388847,0.001834476,0.0007488756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0411576,0.0008552717,0.0007118708,0.0005492689,0.0009337207,0.002241172,0.001673901,0.003508305,0.0003459538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008560001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001134194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003853498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963058,0.0009386398,0.0005434807,0.0006605201,0.001401956,0.0001496325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901997,0.006606602,0.0005554653,0.001204864,0.001331179,0.0001021772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005627916,0.0003218034,0.02430141,0.002113177,0.0005956927,0.002954158,0.0026946,0.3143159,0.2199983,0.2068208,0.005713863,0.2196076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005330849,0.0001303519,0.002974553,0.0001578629,0.0001365908,0.0008872582,0.000241809,0.808673,0.1482556,0.02719676,0.01114533,0.0001475076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1663377,0.001879445,0.8213113,0.002756981,0.001228169,0.00009671597,0.0001296867,0.00082243,0.005437499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6986019,0.001455287,0.2940156,0.0007989822,0.0002174616,0.0000931552,0.0001002354,0.0007817729,0.00393563],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008548807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04521096,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007342486407555578,"score_gpt":0.2624144811532855,"score_spread":0.2550719947457299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}