{"id":"W2411011304","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.05.017","title":"Assessment of occupational risks to extremely low frequency magnetic fields: Validation of an empirical non-expert approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Preventive Medicine Reports","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Hydro-Québec; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Occupational exposure; Exposure assessment; Expert system; Statistics; Expert elicitation; Standard deviation; Estimation; Computer science; Environmental health; Medicine; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07240667,0.0008987144,0.000638029,0.00144515,0.00106439,0.001070765,0.002327627,0.001691334,0.001996214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1448852,0.0004355397,0.0008064762,0.0005371688,0.002194363,0.001606757,0.002939797,0.0008541385,0.0007709651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000725503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001676503,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004342005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006528534,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9427883,0.03861699,0.003418728,0.006617897,0.007817762,0.0007402972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7650999,0.1647172,0.01073987,0.02594499,0.03189783,0.001600199],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007606895,0.00578339,0.7035873,0.002154586,0.001709178,0.0009037543,0.02680035,0.03364519,0.03088548,0.004094691,0.001249021,0.1815802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007387574,0.01762829,0.7728912,0.0006705197,0.0008252492,0.001657745,0.007210288,0.1382006,0.03967926,0.008115772,0.01200631,0.0003761041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8743218,0.0005178789,0.1163218,0.0001865826,0.000061423,0.001698124,0.0002697269,0.0001076533,0.006515088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9351787,0.0002536468,0.06143241,0.0002217549,0.0000545948,0.0009678138,0.0003471006,0.000051527,0.001492431],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07240667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3829277,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1168858096500565,"score_gpt":0.4381047615760833,"score_spread":0.3212189519260268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}