{"id":"W2411011304","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.05.017","title":"Assessment of occupational risks to extremely low frequency magnetic fields: Validation of an empirical non-expert approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Preventive Medicine Reports","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Hydro-Québec; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine","funders":"","keywords":"Occupational exposure; Exposure assessment; Expert system; Statistics; Expert elicitation; Standard deviation; Estimation; Computer science; Environmental health; Medicine; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001278312,0.0001188758,0.0002833578,0.0000631542,0.00004380074,0.000002139362,0.0001088422,0.00007116418,0.002126211],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003537251,0.00007701671,0.00004460718,0.0001873483,0.0001875789,0.0001861851,0.00007015608,0.00007087074,0.000005510521],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001316522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009155439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001034197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003260871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978878,0.0001677561,0.0007253016,0.0003336852,0.0006885706,0.0001968554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988339,0.0001040735,0.0004332156,0.0003513921,0.00005189626,0.0002255384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004402019,0.0006696642,0.938764,0.00009468421,0.00001555897,0.00001952571,0.002520922,0.0001413017,0.0158562,0.00003474923,0.002890084,0.03894933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002995525,0.001001755,0.9928846,0.0001701815,0.00001807321,0.00001949401,0.0001192497,0.0002955902,0.003775063,0.001150948,0.0001681659,0.00009733459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.860462,0.00003020689,0.13204,0.00116218,0.0001174811,0.0005042918,0.000005354179,0.00001099064,0.005667495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855671,0.00001377353,0.01371117,0.0003449491,0.00007590475,0.000037552,0.00001824832,0.000007397702,0.0002238946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1251051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998786,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1168858096500565,"score_gpt":0.4381047615760833,"score_spread":0.3212189519260268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}