{"id":"W2412787177","doi":"10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1","title":"Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Ethics","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":201,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"National Human Genome Research Institute; University of Oxford; Wellcome Trust; Wellcome","keywords":"Rhetoric; Public relations; Sociology; Public engagement; Context (archaeology); Political science; Citizenship; Citizen science; Civic engagement; Government (linguistics); Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0370175,0.00008719612,0.0001093445,0.0001657925,0.0008045772,0.0001117395,0.0009238816,0.0001294623,0.03623947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1395423,0.00004440505,0.00003701045,0.002112739,0.008892772,0.0002352932,0.0007685611,0.0006239293,0.0002930589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001258413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002880526,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002491688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005337466,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903119,0.001161069,0.0003342186,0.0003901614,0.007286206,0.0005163996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858876,0.01315696,0.00008261601,0.0002638278,0.0003600507,0.0002489079],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008704833,0.000415017,0.3112359,0.0001982208,0.00001460415,0.00002260639,0.008381065,0.000005611544,0.008138224,0.6548416,0.01385153,0.002808517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003440135,0.0002802929,0.867433,0.001311227,0.00001303363,0.00002445257,0.04093665,0.0008732731,0.01074798,0.04674894,0.02746404,0.0007270399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9255863,0.00007810764,0.0007945581,0.01974823,0.0005998368,0.0003513084,0.00007388506,0.00003683644,0.05273091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989212,0.0003154365,0.00006186977,0.0002929737,0.00004763397,0.00003832022,0.000004771709,0.000005801328,0.0003120448],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6080927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.50264838271306,"score_gpt":0.4666921157320523,"score_spread":0.03595626698100773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}