{"id":"W2413385969","doi":"10.1002/jrsm.1215","title":"Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: three case studies using systematic reviews from agri‐food public health","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Synthesis Methods","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Public Health Agency of Canada","funders":"Public Health Agency; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Rigour; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Publication bias; Systematic error; Public health; Computer science; MEDLINE; Management science; Statistics; Econometrics; Psychology; Data science; Medicine; Biology; Mathematics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7789333,0.004425175,0.007431007,0.01772896,0.006201442,0.01689962,0.01014257,0.01834491,0.003590428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9142925,0.004877204,0.01762588,0.02257678,0.009879348,0.01667514,0.01663051,0.01624836,0.0005255325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03181124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05214762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008683921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01462797,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1095083,0.6780015,0.1432224,0.006576512,0.05952735,0.003163976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.02848621,0.8572288,0.05970297,0.02209806,0.0311958,0.001288081],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01251364,0.001103359,0.04892447,0.2134848,0.02390882,0.008406276,0.05231678,0.02310359,0.00419983,0.1255135,0.02790696,0.458618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009710761,0.004652312,0.03421656,0.3063684,0.03802423,0.00690424,0.01694789,0.05115748,0.0133324,0.3807786,0.1355261,0.002381075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1077504,0.1510367,0.4106838,0.2467097,0.008300617,0.05930709,0.003018989,0.001133432,0.01205922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.308801,0.01771127,0.6006889,0.02503794,0.001102552,0.04516728,0.0006841465,0.000230277,0.000576626],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2210667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2726147,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9919902489356272,"score_gpt":0.7661392033767591,"score_spread":0.225851045558868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}