{"id":"W2414191597","doi":"10.1177/2047487316654026","title":"Use of smokeless tobacco and risk of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"European Journal of Preventive Cardiology","topic":"Smoking Behavior and Cessation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Medical Research Council","keywords":"Medicine; Meta-analysis; Smokeless tobacco; Odds ratio; Stroke (engine); Confidence interval; Cohort study; Relative risk; Observational study; Internal medicine; Disease; Environmental health; Tobacco use; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005164457,0.0003396249,0.0127457,0.0004356077,0.00002405825,0.00000893744,0.0001662584,0.00007441073,0.0000331349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001179234,0.0001818299,0.008491931,0.0003050622,0.0001893147,0.00007850968,0.0001035094,0.0003150664,7.793922e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003432033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008994897,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000284006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.183889e-8,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9883723,0.008920745,0.001884068,0.0003011455,0.0003869196,0.0001348292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948664,0.0004414331,0.003159068,0.0007309008,0.0006389862,0.0001631841],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001319774,0.00001963721,0.0008948994,0.3447703,0.638113,0.0002675845,0.00001616619,0.000002456543,1.609034e-7,0.000004668485,0.00004205944,0.01585595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002127033,0.0001233022,0.00319806,0.06332734,0.9178253,0.0004350395,0.000006521213,3.971697e-8,2.693344e-7,0.000001864928,0.01474444,0.0001250978],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003240664,0.9972348,0.001095507,0.000008333733,0.00005329471,0.0009798635,0.0002693936,0.000003262349,0.00003152353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002765498,0.9969343,0.00005757169,0.000009369342,0.00005854441,0.000013874,0.00001846575,0.00003733736,0.0001050661],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2814429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8712705,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1206900202828033,"score_gpt":0.3402309975494499,"score_spread":0.2195409772666466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}