{"id":"W2414979911","doi":"10.1109/lcomm.2016.2578314","title":"Average Rate Analysis for the Full-Duplex MISO Interference Channel","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Communications Letters","topic":"Full-Duplex Wireless Communications","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Interference (communication); Channel (broadcasting); Transceiver; Computer science; Duplex (building); Co-channel interference; Telecommunications; Adjacent-channel interference; Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging); Wireless","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002109847,0.002022882,0.001289621,0.001749929,0.0007912778,0.002350011,0.001480354,0.0009503061,0.005532569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007147407,0.0006212803,0.001024079,0.001764965,0.001393117,0.002328482,0.001439233,0.001297625,0.001979649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002216857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001517093,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003098894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002096405,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979907,0.0004387889,0.00007164918,0.0001724465,0.0009504144,0.0003759341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941635,0.003405451,0.0004758486,0.0003957355,0.001447767,0.0001117836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002048826,0.00007270522,0.0006317447,0.0004732926,0.0000995601,0.0004461219,0.0003283421,0.7680244,0.02003059,0.1808916,0.00380378,0.024993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006470782,0.00005421192,0.0002704894,0.00005185196,0.00002824384,0.0002545573,0.00006619241,0.972473,0.003515707,0.02187987,0.001363308,0.00003605126],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03711449,0.004907976,0.9174582,0.0005140911,0.0001379555,0.00007106632,0.0003801253,0.0005484375,0.03886769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282161,0.007339603,0.05152518,0.0003359128,0.0003575308,0.0002385112,0.0004211824,0.0002972708,0.01126875],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005532569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01850826,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0422990942258181,"score_gpt":0.258476197849587,"score_spread":0.2161771036237689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}