{"id":"W2415051971","doi":"10.2138/am-2002-0106","title":"Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopic study of synthetic fluorapatite: Part II. Gd <sup>3+</sup> at the Ca1 site, with a neighboring Ca2 vacancy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Mineralogist","topic":"Crystal Structures and Properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Fluorapatite; Electron paramagnetic resonance; Vacancy defect; Paramagnetism; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Electron nuclear double resonance; Materials science; Crystallography; Chemistry; Mineralogy; Condensed matter physics; Physics; Apatite","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001150195,0.0002947717,0.0004463012,0.00004768103,0.000406575,0.00007119026,0.0003967377,0.00002981568,0.001113088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004850689,0.0001747208,0.00005249591,0.0004710127,0.0008477202,0.00008992178,0.0001635217,0.0001675852,0.00003453383],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001003796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002449677,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01208985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004666352,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99797,0.0001782397,0.0003663899,0.0005112285,0.0004084096,0.000565775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998785,0.00009676298,0.0002571876,0.0007155148,0.00006235043,0.00008324842],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001498895,0.001729012,0.1670145,0.0002009382,0.0001448641,0.0002312726,0.03225477,0.01451043,0.7426788,0.0006882098,0.01351746,0.02553086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01260893,0.1051679,0.3921974,0.001064942,0.001420037,0.0009338704,0.01981508,0.01512193,0.2242847,0.0005623536,0.2196185,0.007204281],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954155,0.002144062,0.000004466174,0.0004370658,0.00006139866,0.0004751825,0.00002743928,0.00005393463,0.001380968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963189,0.000171367,0.000170232,0.0001247275,0.0001078531,0.00008493363,0.000004486412,0.0000315986,0.002985848],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5183941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01203405929061983,"score_gpt":0.2214880136785299,"score_spread":0.2094539543879101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}