{"id":"W2415099531","doi":"10.1017/s026646231500015x","title":"MEDICAL DEVICE PRICES IN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Economics","funders":"","keywords":"Activity-based costing; Capital equipment; Purchasing; Economic evaluation; Capital expenditure; Economic analysis; Actuarial science; Economic cost; Cost–benefit analysis; Economics; Medical device; Observational study; Business; Public economics; Medicine; Accounting; Operations management; Industrial organization; Agricultural economics; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3859551,0.00282214,0.005622201,0.02174013,0.002424996,0.01688748,0.004712949,0.004626979,0.005337344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7603799,0.001927356,0.005594751,0.03327767,0.008278822,0.01274062,0.005007578,0.008778503,0.0003856496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0443405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03915891,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1269174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09695566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4058731,0.476605,0.03774495,0.006244097,0.0708119,0.002720868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1593415,0.7384183,0.03372637,0.009560346,0.05759656,0.001356824],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001741489,0.0001851355,0.02599321,0.05422832,0.00915374,0.000355678,0.002493047,0.02730705,0.0001510505,0.3989972,0.0351345,0.4442596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001725013,0.0008568862,0.05652341,0.2537638,0.01091409,0.0008350877,0.00263907,0.03963921,0.001696397,0.3722808,0.2578892,0.00123701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01705202,0.7383643,0.118851,0.04252352,0.005643225,0.004099709,0.005567637,0.0002356812,0.06766304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5542399,0.2395022,0.1753329,0.01400554,0.004154555,0.006588355,0.002815363,0.0003908475,0.002970363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3859551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7572266,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2589409278000467,"score_gpt":0.5542676282447753,"score_spread":0.2953267004447286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}