{"id":"W2415970239","doi":"10.1007/s11002-016-9416-z","title":"Malleability of taste perception: biasing effects of rating scale format on taste recognition, product evaluation, and willingness to pay","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Marketing Letters","topic":"Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Taste; Perception; Psychology; Willingness to pay; Product (mathematics); Stimulus (psychology); Scale (ratio); Sample (material); Social psychology; Rating scale; Cognitive psychology; Marketing; Advertising; Business; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01557245,0.0004381913,0.0005871836,0.0009086325,0.0003182571,0.001444069,0.0007317432,0.000952995,0.005015905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08753956,0.0004458017,0.0008219989,0.0004769682,0.001697886,0.00170722,0.0008302001,0.001387474,0.0006016269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005021823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003634101,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001425034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001280546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9926435,0.003946746,0.0005392529,0.001048125,0.001611852,0.0002105141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8481135,0.120987,0.01016262,0.01452856,0.004219724,0.001988573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07919276,0.004619809,0.6307803,0.000538486,0.002245264,0.0004028065,0.005246527,0.001998537,0.1974449,0.002916974,0.000919756,0.07369392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003443752,0.002571116,0.9784787,0.00004544207,0.0002967143,0.0004433003,0.0003008125,0.004162128,0.01067553,0.00213603,0.0004751502,0.00007060222],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942091,0.0002934665,0.002076367,0.0001269517,0.00004615615,0.00006023336,0.00007374051,0.00002169719,0.003092353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980553,0.00005458985,0.0009501537,0.0001422075,0.00003215397,0.00002721467,0.00007519733,0.00005552317,0.000607689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01557245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08235592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09697291313932312,"score_gpt":0.2899850945906816,"score_spread":0.1930121814513585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}