{"id":"W2416259150","doi":"10.1108/ijhg-03-2016-0016","title":"Conflict of interest in pharmaceutical policy research: an example from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Governance","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Conflict of interest; Variety (cybernetics); Pharmaceutical industry; Enforcement; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Political science; Marketing; Qualitative research; Psychology; Business; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Social science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003622312,0.0001663381,0.0004517962,0.0001992252,0.00008556235,0.00001316554,0.00103939,0.0002308757,0.001227161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007766164,0.0001282678,0.00007242205,0.0002571004,0.0003103234,0.0003460529,0.000130738,0.00190967,0.00001019047],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001750721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004927097,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5048565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2389345,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953974,0.001606665,0.001422982,0.000259215,0.0006866722,0.0006270851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956225,0.001753431,0.0008773291,0.0001744299,0.0008746035,0.0006977175],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006530652,0.001734811,0.1130658,0.0001257119,0.0004987924,0.001012217,0.002655376,0.000127667,0.03458515,0.05433295,0.03466013,0.7506707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00781467,0.0005127704,0.132199,0.0007772696,0.00001558784,0.0001438613,0.000499351,0.0002605084,0.03632908,0.004139758,0.8170427,0.0002654678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9185099,0.002387964,0.00007610252,0.07543105,0.002356851,0.0001860891,0.0004712236,0.000007253894,0.0005735582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874068,0.00376373,0.0000761113,0.007281118,0.001311605,0.000005786924,0.000006359736,0.00001654052,0.0001318698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7823825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996858,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8595307178715035,"score_gpt":0.6499365190491762,"score_spread":0.2095941988223273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}