{"id":"W2416259150","doi":"10.1108/ijhg-03-2016-0016","title":"Conflict of interest in pharmaceutical policy research: an example from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Health Governance","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Conflict of interest; Variety (cybernetics); Pharmaceutical industry; Enforcement; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Political science; Marketing; Qualitative research; Psychology; Business; Sociology; Law; Medicine; Social science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04909253,0.0004365424,0.0008494961,0.00276048,0.04477432,0.01838306,0.003194364,0.01003349,0.00402987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08636824,0.0005507284,0.0008892683,0.01080847,0.01812686,0.003341331,0.00819667,0.01018814,0.0002552348],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2106976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4702128,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9766511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816281,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9195451,0.03134448,0.003435551,0.003641681,0.02692208,0.01511116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8277189,0.0993268,0.005522266,0.003886116,0.04179919,0.02174665],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000189617,0.0001844475,0.02694491,0.001332809,0.0001581046,0.009869635,0.1251251,0.001165169,0.0008974346,0.6550416,0.09114567,0.0879455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002247235,0.0001026873,0.03694277,0.002806141,0.0001898725,0.001510443,0.1064093,0.001652381,0.0008129052,0.04641673,0.8026623,0.000269663],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1261308,0.02800399,0.004335481,0.5764701,0.001583486,0.0005793569,0.0003875128,0.00005227803,0.2624569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8728692,0.01383351,0.00423772,0.08675975,0.0002887789,0.0002269244,0.0001521183,0.00005669087,0.02157543],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9154789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8595307178715035,"score_gpt":0.6499365190491762,"score_spread":0.2095941988223273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}