{"id":"W2417517862","doi":"10.5539/ijsp.v5n4p38","title":"Diagonal Exponent Conditional Symmetry Model for Square Contingency Tables with Ordered Categories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics and Probability","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contingency table; Diagonal; Mathematics; Square (algebra); Exponent; Main diagonal; Symmetry (geometry); Orthogonality; Table (database); Asymmetry; Exponential function; Applied mathematics; Statistics; Statistical physics; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Computer science; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009637037,0.0006965466,0.0008561434,0.001587825,0.0005156541,0.001499025,0.002017942,0.0008074674,0.00984907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03267882,0.0004436374,0.001350687,0.0017539,0.002044126,0.003751803,0.001281088,0.002232288,0.001488013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009950878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001108065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001978013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001808118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941958,0.002726887,0.0002994679,0.001075817,0.001229897,0.0004722392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976636,0.0148993,0.002326752,0.003881337,0.001867189,0.0003894465],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001913364,0.00007244784,0.007573049,0.0001078462,0.0001090514,0.0005339269,0.00041692,0.03344338,0.001402682,0.9175191,0.003895649,0.03473474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007018897,0.0001197615,0.003859086,0.00003094607,0.00005475416,0.0005186989,0.0001042234,0.3264002,0.0007284156,0.6646969,0.00336063,0.0000562873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03067517,0.0001317099,0.9646042,0.0004223333,0.00007017449,0.0001360424,0.0005297228,0.0002088184,0.003221853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7853061,0.0003800361,0.2029228,0.0004656348,0.0002665868,0.0008095491,0.001353784,0.0001261319,0.008369398],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00984907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05096614,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07598912612591364,"score_gpt":0.3800760725713977,"score_spread":0.3040869464454841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}