{"id":"W2419036010","doi":"10.1152/jn.01071.2015","title":"Decisions in motion: vestibular contributions to saccadic target selection","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neurophysiology","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"European Research Council; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Saccadic masking; Saccade; Vestibular system; Acceleration; Computer science; Fixation (population genetics); Eye movement; Motion (physics); Computer vision; Biological motion; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Communication; Psychology; Neuroscience; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009888939,0.00009203229,0.000200796,0.0002978699,0.0001038379,0.00001703813,0.0001982511,0.00006483241,0.0001846618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003187887,0.00006075254,0.00005089993,0.000461086,0.00004886223,0.0001927326,0.00003441885,0.000196935,0.0002047765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007153742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007658939,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.445756e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.292854e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987851,0.0002770693,0.0003698094,0.0001914579,0.0001658451,0.0002107431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991589,0.0002794786,0.0001616121,0.00009030905,0.0001636392,0.000146028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009881132,0.00007553898,0.00001870915,8.769833e-7,9.326956e-7,0.00003331817,0.00002918603,0.001073257,0.9933254,0.0007205578,0.0002470891,0.004376388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003505797,0.007233448,0.07511374,0.0002629369,0.00002501428,0.00179309,0.00002730776,0.001606486,0.8123106,0.05777752,0.0398513,0.0004927035],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440033,0.000005385307,0.0512125,0.003780348,0.0008373538,0.00007886866,0.0000137199,0.00002022223,0.00004825832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968277,0.00006969691,0.0006203349,0.002061399,0.0003055565,0.000002455969,2.352616e-7,0.00001020056,0.0001024542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1810147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3816429,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04319908349193605,"score_gpt":0.3431452629944841,"score_spread":0.299946179502548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}