{"id":"W2419563342","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1381","title":"A meta‐analysis of the UTAUT model: Eleven years later","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Operationalization; Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology; Meta-analysis; Proxy (statistics); Social influence; Psychology; Empirical research; Computer science; Econometrics; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0632339,0.002615432,0.008513219,0.009848912,0.000779072,0.004228623,0.002323465,0.002247371,0.006061824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1560077,0.001498809,0.04047536,0.01018391,0.0008897811,0.003368195,0.001990576,0.002955881,0.0005835876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005321899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006660074,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005924196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01169788,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9521666,0.02908578,0.01019352,0.003459004,0.004482587,0.0006124431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8754123,0.08989092,0.01383481,0.008221792,0.01180115,0.0008389539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002711272,0.00009322878,0.007970624,0.2210783,0.7125654,0.0002719943,0.0005156356,0.001067244,0.0003956811,0.001381336,0.003302708,0.04864664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011335,0.0008318626,0.01177479,0.04857514,0.9203897,0.000250289,0.0002374656,0.0006780836,0.0004165323,0.001976168,0.01363783,0.00009873726],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01495065,0.964216,0.009672916,0.001737593,0.001585917,0.002073792,0.00405472,0.0001782745,0.001530116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45441,0.4966408,0.02635756,0.003426983,0.001253343,0.01117176,0.004477632,0.0002828652,0.001979031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9367661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3344168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3174621741420131,"score_gpt":0.3997986490737053,"score_spread":0.08233647493169227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}