{"id":"W2419681323","doi":"10.1111/conl.12275","title":"Conservation (In)Action: Renewing the Relevance of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Letters","topic":"Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mandate; Convention on Biological Diversity; Biosphere; Environmental resource management; Sustainability; Environmental planning; Political science; Biodiversity; Biodiversity conservation; Work (physics); Indigenous; Relevance (law); Diversity (politics); Business; Geography; Ecology; Engineering; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005552668,0.0001334771,0.0001656817,0.00003976817,0.0002144119,0.00001570522,0.0002423295,0.00007155714,0.0004090471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000583539,0.00008502082,0.00006238552,0.0006927838,0.0006937362,0.0004274206,0.00008863189,0.00009079064,0.0000528034],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009590404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001580959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002356293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01310826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986248,0.0001687111,0.0004383538,0.0002913113,0.000243045,0.0002337561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984673,0.0009124054,0.0002334714,0.0003107868,0.00004322879,0.00003277728],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003158463,0.0000214563,0.937927,0.00001015851,0.00001235134,0.000001358764,0.0001337561,0.0001048594,0.04134838,0.0005484566,0.01833409,0.001526517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004395985,0.00002628954,0.960756,0.0000591871,0.000009158561,0.000001519539,0.0001146877,0.0001681537,0.001722881,0.001327145,0.03525151,0.0001238755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8207041,0.0000698312,0.0007779043,0.1776412,0.0001658197,0.0002043235,0.000003404639,0.0000320613,0.0004013875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988464,0.0002315643,0.0004998511,0.01012027,0.00003961989,0.000054477,0.000003912343,0.00001023754,0.0005760657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1677599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7314716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02646260501907563,"score_gpt":0.2404577800870256,"score_spread":0.2139951750679499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}