{"id":"W2424161488","doi":"10.1002/ece3.1870","title":"Accounting for size‐specific predation improves our ability to predict the strength of a trophic cascade","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Marine and coastal plant biology","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hakai Institute; Universities Space Research Association; Tula Foundation","keywords":"Predation; Trophic level; Cascade; Trophic cascade; Ecology; Environmental science; Accounting; Biology; Predator; Economics; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003365942,0.00005750991,0.00009343684,0.00002528107,0.0001181338,0.000005607301,0.00007208719,0.00008003148,0.00007772948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002222357,0.00003056194,0.00002272562,0.00005088047,0.00004972891,0.00009237833,0.00001473276,0.00003955702,0.000009777581],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004823321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002486853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005476858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004783342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994446,0.00005732887,0.0001437916,0.0001594482,0.00003888853,0.0001559609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999401,0.0003878587,0.00006639105,0.00008292046,0.00003309504,0.0000287138],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003442866,0.00001543674,0.8816283,0.00002172073,0.00001223094,2.39164e-7,0.00006311715,0.00001883046,0.01119682,0.0002913624,0.001122381,0.1052853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002218612,0.0003868387,0.9944652,0.000003993984,0.000008208317,0.00000566756,0.0001039919,0.000499039,0.0002098306,0.001667991,0.002382566,0.00004484829],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972354,0.00006128484,0.0002811777,0.001456938,0.0002424557,0.0002669804,0.0001276592,0.00001172737,0.0003163947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993451,0.00003059523,0.000134804,0.00004797106,0.0001322307,0.000006804526,0.00002283794,9.240093e-7,0.0002787483],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1128369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2669217,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008576597477196322,"score_gpt":0.2008390378670257,"score_spread":0.1922624403898293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}