{"id":"W2424649257","doi":"10.15173/bcgppp.v3i1.1200","title":"Promoting the Hegemonic Paradigm: The Case Study of the Journal International Security in the Discipline of International Security Studies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bridges Conversations in Global Politics and Public Policy","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Hegemony; Security studies; International security; International relations; Political science; Critical security studies; Sociology; Epistemology; Public administration; Law; Politics; Network security policy; Cloud computing security; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01972342,0.0004951761,0.0007577564,0.004432627,0.02945434,0.01842172,0.001643133,0.005991031,0.003068571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03100141,0.0004310331,0.0004250619,0.009400979,0.0243211,0.01131333,0.01004753,0.005920881,0.000479279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009280583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008498078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006748959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01237312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9751579,0.02046358,0.0004020137,0.0005041684,0.001887495,0.001584821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688808,0.02315979,0.002175775,0.001255943,0.001611586,0.002916057],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005862965,0.0002090201,0.006840715,0.000156842,0.00001060024,0.004226571,0.8582227,0.0001574138,0.0006074973,0.1154262,0.003182161,0.01090159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000184257,0.0001150727,0.003225863,0.0002274976,0.00001407312,0.001554403,0.8838039,0.000400109,0.0006197975,0.01916754,0.09081459,0.00003878228],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8834145,0.002972308,0.004299542,0.03145131,0.0005128431,0.0001233265,0.00003635184,0.00003383921,0.07715594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992083,0.001517043,0.001150302,0.001318513,0.0001572554,0.00005867512,0.00001458221,0.00002729224,0.003673363],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9705456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1043087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03783099764300075,"score_gpt":0.3761279873973605,"score_spread":0.3382969897543597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}