{"id":"W2425950469","doi":"10.1080/08941920.2016.1180729","title":"Changes in Wisconsin’s Large Private Forests, 1999–2015: Land Ownership, Conservation, and Recreational Access","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Society & Natural Resources","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Agricultural Statistics Service","keywords":"Divestment; Easement; Business; Recreation; Land tenure; Public land; Natural resource economics; State forest; State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Finance; Forest management; Forestry; Economics; Agriculture; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003189737,0.0001347187,0.0001169207,0.00003237035,0.0001521984,0.00007949321,0.0002354363,0.00008094397,0.0007798178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000821282,0.00008425404,0.00004785006,0.0002451264,0.000298181,0.0003950318,0.0003208819,0.0001055516,0.00007987033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008473642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006469542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000622673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007611962,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989775,0.00004390517,0.000133792,0.000268986,0.00025537,0.0003204818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956,0.0001465621,0.00008252051,0.0001363331,0.000007791814,0.00006682061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000188774,0.00001386158,0.9459346,0.00001066526,0.00001270751,0.000001174179,0.0008511097,0.000004154584,0.0001993066,0.00049871,0.04992273,0.00253213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005506568,0.00001676112,0.6923408,0.00004103357,0.000006742388,0.000001165014,0.00004139666,0.000271163,0.00006697711,0.0010812,0.3054493,0.0001328109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777297,0.0003654343,0.00001160516,0.01995138,0.00005621933,0.0001987269,0.00001657908,0.00003884949,0.001631527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878525,0.0003744166,0.0002550674,0.002000594,0.00009393442,0.00001833821,0.00001938357,0.00001114295,0.009374659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2555266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8538457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0149566004437616,"score_gpt":0.2625776991743028,"score_spread":0.2476210987305413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}