{"id":"W2428930797","doi":"10.1037/a0038862","title":"Test or toy? Materiality and the measurement of infant intelligence.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"History of Psychology","topic":"Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Materiality (auditing); Scholarship; Test (biology); Psychology; History of psychology; Human intelligence; Scale (ratio); Intelligence quotient; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Social psychology; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Art; Political science; Law; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002017016,0.0001825156,0.0005855795,0.0001387485,0.00003031632,0.000001356744,0.0004632597,0.0003046635,0.001873153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005905496,0.0001223419,0.00008820624,0.0001300811,0.003418693,0.00003623001,0.00007143278,0.0003202488,0.00007080096],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004309359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001331185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000422426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003372626,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978646,0.0004046843,0.00072954,0.0004562757,0.0002813327,0.0002635669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982153,0.0002657389,0.0004534433,0.0006846298,0.0002575108,0.000123435],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01239544,0.001028721,0.003214151,0.00005939995,0.0002586313,0.00002208571,0.05865934,0.000001190465,0.001876204,0.1897604,0.721753,0.01097143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004586592,0.001450029,0.009868914,0.0000267769,0.000119524,0.0001703969,0.002745205,0.000008126285,0.00005801302,0.03381319,0.946866,0.0002872122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03118407,0.03134758,0.004845862,0.00316109,0.02353538,0.0008231067,0.00002943418,0.0000871214,0.9049864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922764,0.0002084032,0.0005137614,0.001338203,0.0002417562,0.00005892276,0.000001313923,0.00002396867,0.005337317],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9610923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992934,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1553565220960814,"score_gpt":0.378641028604109,"score_spread":0.2232845065080275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}