{"id":"W2430767271","doi":"10.15402/esj.v1i2.118","title":"A Seat at the Table: Implications of Structure and Diversity in Community Food Assessments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Promotion (chess); Diversity (politics); Food systems; Perception; Public relations; Process (computing); Business; Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Environmental planning; Political science; Psychology; Environmental resource management; Geography; Politics; Agriculture; Economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6218447,0.0001907819,0.0003566816,0.0004771546,0.6477913,0.0001062276,0.000767855,0.0002811298,0.0001732095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3224938,0.0001268419,0.00005084396,0.0004445363,0.000475155,0.0006726785,0.002986513,0.5828454,0.000005929626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004979527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002610369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003591341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005610073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3831457,0.6153896,0.0004210254,0.0001182987,0.0004071582,0.0005181393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7464014,0.2520993,0.0002989695,0.0005545536,0.0003610517,0.0002847489],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001172736,0.0001262696,0.4640629,0.0002074615,0.00006458322,0.00000170593,0.5250481,0.00002934359,0.003646694,0.0002529492,0.0005764582,0.00586623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001325942,0.0003754231,0.4690954,0.0005961512,0.00001577779,0.00002083884,0.5226893,0.00002300373,0.0000139553,0.001847757,0.003888487,0.0001078655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946995,0.0005353692,0.0001140891,0.002780076,0.0001109386,0.0004956718,0.0000778866,0.00004041814,0.001146029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981043,0.0005428141,0.0004673584,0.000165734,0.00007176364,0.00001593388,0.00001959192,0.0000250851,0.0005874695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6473162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6832131,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4122993039318584,"score_gpt":0.5231715821014841,"score_spread":0.1108722781696256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}