{"id":"W2432784397","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.01.010","title":"Lacrimal abscess mimicking a choroidal mass: an ultrawide field evaluation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Treatments","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abscess; Medicine; Ophthalmology; Anatomy; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000726742,0.002769546,0.001600269,0.005542104,0.003584038,0.002105691,0.002337403,0.00862627,0.004901313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00650094,0.001645109,0.002185331,0.002900399,0.002712339,0.005955908,0.002160677,0.006791588,0.00131699],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004007237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002463263,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007391639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006174197,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987716,0.0001372943,0.0001589235,0.0002788051,0.0002370475,0.0004163004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968838,0.0008576084,0.000345117,0.0002742339,0.0004287913,0.001210397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003406043,0.00003869758,0.002857814,0.00002519449,0.000005303679,0.9952793,0.00007602335,0.00005926974,0.0003961005,0.0001032972,0.0003723769,0.0007526124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002827845,0.0001431516,0.007686617,0.00005075372,0.00003742233,0.9889817,0.0003328964,0.0007800872,0.0005387423,0.0004197085,0.0009767713,0.00002388856],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":"case_report","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8745397,0.01131238,0.005969694,0.04052239,0.001787761,0.0008894191,0.001060442,0.0005606068,0.06335761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787402,0.003699968,0.003459261,0.006689511,0.004465673,0.00007143468,0.0002379034,0.0000833319,0.002552788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00862627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02907467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05080144052935733,"score_gpt":0.334455403110019,"score_spread":0.2836539625806617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}