{"id":"W2433776048","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpca.5b04309","title":"Computational Study of Chemical Reactivity Using Information-Theoretic Quantities from Density Functional Reactivity Theory for Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution Reactions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","topic":"Chemical Reaction Mechanisms","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Chemistry; Reactivity (psychology); Computational chemistry; Regioselectivity; Electrophile; Density functional theory; Nucleophile; Aromaticity; Ab initio; Molecule; Organic chemistry; Catalysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007531305,0.0002346473,0.0004630528,0.00003886796,0.000119355,0.00003317883,0.0002773139,0.0001226592,0.00004671688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001587994,0.0001854981,0.0002358941,0.0001799963,0.0002379418,0.0005770338,0.00006446658,0.0006022804,0.000003386446],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004339069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003322026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006198824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.557776e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980379,0.00009408364,0.0006885572,0.0001550759,0.0008136622,0.0002107274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957265,0.002072985,0.001116612,0.0003148566,0.0006040939,0.0001650005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001570026,0.001220754,0.00003053595,0.00008328761,0.0001921202,0.000001258755,0.000827272,0.009975286,0.9850923,0.0008386206,0.00002929336,0.0001391881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00154944,0.00009900677,0.00005751142,0.00007133515,0.0004093125,0.0001176729,0.001888028,0.02711092,0.8824247,0.08606242,0.00003637566,0.0001733533],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725914,0.00001279767,0.02688269,0.00004044066,0.00004479166,0.0001284379,0.00003321707,0.00002920967,0.0002370395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991069,0.000001320444,0.0002981906,0.00001238041,0.0004889825,0.000008436629,0.00005470915,0.00001669332,0.00001234585],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1026677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7564392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03084505220105293,"score_gpt":0.2683237742983563,"score_spread":0.2374787220973034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}