{"id":"W2433823134","doi":"10.1111/jep.12580","title":"Interpreting risk as evidence of causality: lessons learned from a legal case to determine medical malpractice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Causality (physics); Context (archaeology); Malpractice; Actuarial science; Medical malpractice; Psychology; Medicine; Law; Political science; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09617367,0.001791811,0.002820011,0.007840539,0.003907649,0.01028335,0.006043379,0.01166117,0.004565541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2910021,0.001359679,0.002859884,0.003782202,0.03208201,0.02006604,0.0087581,0.02194732,0.0008236545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009547686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01198133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02902982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0321114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9438234,0.0421556,0.003646614,0.002935487,0.006347713,0.001091093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6375111,0.3340032,0.004531438,0.009253421,0.01291516,0.001785794],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002063533,0.0002977558,0.02298374,0.001230155,0.0004169361,0.004368157,0.009958799,0.01065029,0.0002979368,0.7448184,0.01605787,0.1887135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008110958,0.00009027337,0.002347779,0.001477518,0.0001063246,0.001369337,0.002967546,0.01025145,0.0002663898,0.9620436,0.01890575,0.00009288463],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03969302,0.08612161,0.3536888,0.4612345,0.00254791,0.0005389896,0.0002865189,0.0001937072,0.05569486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6561798,0.04906327,0.239166,0.04504734,0.005037898,0.0005544823,0.0001777737,0.0002372433,0.004536189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09617367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5086211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4846455913689095,"score_gpt":0.6732008179308865,"score_spread":0.188555226561977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}